On Thanksgiving Week of 2012, one of his former students revealed in an internet message that Joshu Sasaki Roshi, the venerable 105 year old founder and Zen Master of Rinzai-ji (a prominent Zen Buddhist Community in America), had been involved in extensive sexual misconduct with his female students. This particular Japanese monk has been most popularly known as the teacher of the famous singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen. He arrived in California from Japan half a century ago, and proceeded to establish many Zen Buddhist practice centers across the country.
I was a student of Sasaki Roshi from 1971-1974, first at his Los Angeles center, and later at Mt. Baldy, where I lived as one of about a dozen permanent residents for over 2 years. About half were male and the other half female. I have written something about my experiences elsewhere in my blogs (for example here ).
When I arrived at Mt. Baldy, I realized that the monastic Abbess also served as Roshi’s mistress. Soon after my arrival, they apparently had a falling-out due to Roshi’s sexual exploits with another female student. I was to learn that Roshi was quite the horny old fellow, and that sanzen for many female students consisted of a lot of fondling and sex play. Moreover, several of the students were also sexually active with each other, so it came as no surprise that, when one person contracted a sexually transmitted disease, some of the other students eventually got it. It was even suggested that it had started with Roshi.
One time in sanzen (formal interview of teacher and student), Roshi took a good look at me and remarked, “Zen is not the way of the saint.” I guess he was seeing my rather eccentric upbringing — I was raised as a Catholic, and had spent 7 years in a Catholic Seminary studying to be a priest. In any case, he told me that I should read “dirty books”. He said he enjoyed them (pornography). I felt that was fine for him, but I was not attracted to that pursuit. He told me that I wanted to attach to the Absolute, but needed to first totally throw myself into the objective world, which included sexuality. I understood his point.
Most so-called spiritual practitioners don’t ever inspect, much less resolve, the emotional/sexual contraction at the core of their psychological make-up, and so tend as a rule to indulge the classic “spiritual by-pass”, which is a form of avoidance and even a strategic denial of a critical aspect of human development. Roshi told me that, when the monks were out on Takuhatsu (food begging) back at his Japanese monastery, they carried a stone under their robes with which they would hit their penises when they saw women and began to get aroused. So much for dealing with their sexuality.
Over the course of many decades since my time with Roshi, I have witnessed the same scenes played out ad nauseam in Dharma centers, ashrams, and temples across America, and yet rarely has anyone really addressed the core contraction. Rather, they either look the other way, or wring their hands and talk about oversight committees and so forth — all totally beside the point.
What’s clear and apparent is this: so-called “spiritual” practice itself, even most if not all religion itself (both esoteric and exoteric) as it is practiced today, can often become one big exercise in avoidance, misdirection, and chronic self-loathing. Sadly, establishing grounds for a classic internal conflict, or emotional/sexual contraction, has been and continues to be a feature of most human religions, mainly because of ignorance and fear of the true power of sexuality. This contraction forms the basis for countless manifestations of immature fixation, neurosis, and even full-blown pathology throughout history.
Hopefully, humans will someday make peace with their own bodies, and allow a natural developmental process to unfold, in which the physical embodiment vehicle is appreciated for what it is, and lovingly released when it is time to evolve beyond exclusive identification with it.
In any event, there is no enlightenment, no liberation, salvation, redemption, or transcendence outside of the way we behave right here, in the very midst of this life, which includes sexuality at the very core of who and what we are as human beings. Until that is really seen, understood, and integrated, then we will continue to encounter these apparent “scandals”, which are merely glaring symptoms of a fundamental flaw in the mature appreciation of the essential role of sexuality in human psychological development and social adaptation, and the consequent epidemic of chronic emotional/sexual contraction that plagues not only the spiritual aspirant, but just about every human walking the earth today who has been influenced by the corruption that most take to be their “religion”.
How many more “Sex Scandals” in the Buddhist community, for example, is it going to take before its adherents wake up and recognize that there is something fundamentally wrong with the way their Religion is taught and practiced, all throughout the various sects? The Tibetan and Zen schools get the most attention of course, since they seem to dominate the spiritual landscape when it comes to Buddhism (and sexual peccadillos) here in the West, but Buddhism itself has never truly come to terms with the whole subject of sexuality, and so it is no wonder these sorts of issues will perpetually make the news. We’ve also come to learn that, for each reported sexual “misconduct” incident, there are typically a dozen or more that go unreported, so it is probably safe to say that we are talking about more than just a few errant fellows with over-active testosterone and unresolved power complexes.
Rather than really bothering to look beyond the symptoms and go to the root of the festering disease, each successive scandal usually ends up with a righteous mob ad hominem attack on the perpetrator du jour, followed by more talk about committees and regulations and so forth (not unlike the talk about handgun controls after each mass shooting that pops up almost weekly now in the new Wild West). Sure, what we need is more government!
Really, how many so-called Zen Masters and Rinpoches will need to be “outed” before it is recognized that the problem is with the institutional teaching of Buddhism itself (not unlike the fact that the problem with the Catholic Predator-Priest Scandals is overwhelmingly generated by the Catholic religion’s attitudes and teachings about sexuality in the first place)?
Let’s look at Zen Buddhist practice, since that seems to be where the action is these days on the scandal front. This so-called Zen School (whether Rinzai, Soto, or Korean) talks a lot about taming the mind and mastering the gut (or hara), but rarely if ever deals with the heart (except perhaps in some vague terms regarding “Bodhisattvic compassion” — an idealism based on a confused notion of “saving all beings”, even though their scriptures paradoxically note that there is not even a single being to save. See here ).
In any case, this practice, with few exceptions, attempts to bypass the heart, because it is confused by and even fearful of what lurks there (the emotional/sexual contraction), so instead it by-passes it, in pursuit of a conceptual ideal of enlightenment, where emotions themselves are commonly shrugged off as something akin to delusional poisons.
Ironically, for all its talk about no-self, the Zen that I have observed (over 4 decades) seems to be one of the more self-preoccupied and often down-right selfish practices currently being pursued in the so-called “spiritual” scene here in the West. It is no wonder that the implications of such selfishness would yield the non-stop onslaught of sexual scandals we witness (not to mention what goes publicly unreported). What all of that clearly demonstrates is an absence of any emphasis on awakening at the heart, and yet without such an awakening, all the rest is, to borrow a phrase, “clanging bells”.
The chronic emotional/sexual contraction that plagues just about every human being — the habitual twisting, suppression, and corruption of the primal motive to love and be loved — is spawned at the heart, and hence it will be only at the heart that it can be understood, seen through, healed, and released. Try as one might, there will be no true healing by (mis)directing attention away from it, to the head or gut — there is a whole midsection of the being that needs attention too, and often even more so than the head or gut. The heart will simply not be denied, and if you ignore that plain and obvious fact, Dear Roshi, you may find yourself in bed with disciples who are all too ready to pen their “tell-all” memoir as soon as the affair ends, (not to mention the many shattered victims that may be left in the wake of your failure to grow up and integrate your sexuality into a mature level of social and personal adaptation).
When the meditation aspirant emerges from their heady samadhi, they still must attend to the heart. When the samurai emerges from their sword play, they still must contend with their heart. However, because the heart is so little understood (and even threatening), they would just as soon avoid it (both the meditator and the martial artist), and hence we end up with both the big names (as well as plenty of little ones) in the Zen game here in the West periodically dragged through the same mud, along with their compatriots the Tibetan Rinpoches, the Neo-Advaitins, and the various Gurus and Swamis that regularly wander over from the East, ill-prepared as lambs to the slaughter for the sexual Disneyland of modern America awaiting here to test, bedazzle, and humble them. It is a failure of character, a failure of integrity, which in essence is a failure of heart.
Remember, one cannot transcend what one has never truly understood and resolved in their own direct life experience. This is precisely why we get brilliant (and sometimes not so brilliant) teachers and religious figures who are nevertheless brought down over and over again by their failure to inspect and heal the knot at their hearts, which in turn manifests in all sorts of pathological ways to the detriment of both themselves, their students, and the Dharma (teaching) they are attempting to transmit.
The American teacher Adyashanti made a pertinent observation when he wrote: “You can have a tremendously transformational experience, and it doesn’t immediately get rid of all of your contradictions and confusions. Sometimes your deepest shadow comes up after your deepest awakening. Often we have to begin by admitting what is still churning within us.”
As for a bit of advice to anyone contemplating getting involved with any teacher: take some time inspecting your motives for embarking on the spiritual path in the first place. Most of us do so based on uninspected motives, so that would be the first place to start. Upon careful and thorough investigation, we might even begin to question who and what we truly are — who is this character believed in need of spiritual instruction? If we manage to just stay with that inquiry to the point of gnosis, then our relationship with any subsequent intermediary will be a mature one, and not based on fantasy, projection, or potential victimization.
In closing, I would offer that humans are the least qualified to judge each other. However, having said that, I would add that there are no such entities as “Spiritual Masters”. We are each a unique expression of Source, and no expression is superior to another. There is only one, without a second. In fact, ultimately there is not even That, about which, nothing more can really be said. Just so, rather than putting our attention on the behavior of others, we need to carefully inspect our own. That is plenty of work in itself, and so focusing on others’ conduct is mostly just a distraction in that regard. If aspirants get involved with a character posing as a master, then it is because they have lessons to learn in that experience. This human life is really all about experiencing, and seeing through each experience to the emptiness inherent in it, as well as the Love that is the Source of all manifestation. It is only Love that really matters – all else is but preparation for that realization.
“There is only one book worth reading — the heart.”
A Word About Teachers
A good teacher is one who points the student back to themselves, their own original nature. However, that is usually the last place the student wants to go. Why? Because original nature is empty, and emptiness, when merely contemplated by the intellect, implies some sort of falling into a meaningless void, the collapse of all identity structures, the death of good times. That is a serious threat to the student’s idealism and enthusiasm for the undertaking. After all, they have heard that one becomes a Buddha upon enlightenment, and based on the statues, that prospect looks pretty cool — just sitting around, smiling like one has a special secret.
Consequently, the student typically projects all sorts of stuff onto the teacher, all of which turn out to be fantasies. If the student is wise, one clear pointing is enough to get started. Perhaps some polishing can come later, if they manage to awaken to some extent. The teacher does not do the awakening, nor do they pass along some transcendental mojo with a word, a glance, a twinkle of the eye, or swat of a stick. There is nothing new to be received which is not already the case. Original nature simply wakes up to itself, when enough of the obstructions are removed which have been concealing its shine.
The teacher cannot do the work for us. We must do it, by first discarding the false. What is false? Everything we believe we are, everything we have been told we are. We have confused ourselves with our own ideas, which we believed to be true. A truly qualified teacher simply points out how we have chronically fooled ourselves into fixated identification with the false, thereby creating an obstruction to clear seeing, or recognizing true nature.
In this culture (and it has probably always been the case to one degree or another), many teachers have ended up becoming part of the obstruction, typically because of character flaws that became distractions. However, for those who do not allow their attention to become distracted, but instead persevere with the original pointing instructions, revelations will inevitably follow. After all, it is not such a big deal to be oneself. The main problem all along has simply consisted of us trying to be otherwise, based on myths, superstitions, fantasies about awakening, our catalogue of self-images, and the plain reluctance to relinquish hope and fear.
Some Further Related Writings: